Zayin wrote:Normal fusion block damage.
E-clips are not explosive material, so taping one to a fusion block wouldn't add anything to the explosion.
Now what would shorting two E-clips together do?
Moderators: Immortals, Supreme Beings, Old Ones
Zayin wrote:Normal fusion block damage.
E-clips are not explosive material, so taping one to a fusion block wouldn't add anything to the explosion.
Zer0 Kay wrote:Zayin wrote:Normal fusion block damage.
E-clips are not explosive material, so taping one to a fusion block wouldn't add anything to the explosion.
Now what would shorting two E-clips together do?
Ah now what if the wire was made of MDC material? Have you ever passed current from one terminal to another with a bare wire? What could you cut through with that much power?RainOfSteel wrote:Zer0 Kay wrote:Zayin wrote:Normal fusion block damage.
E-clips are not explosive material, so taping one to a fusion block wouldn't add anything to the explosion.
Now what would shorting two E-clips together do?
Cause electrocution?
Solothurn wrote:I figured it could be an equivalent to a fusion block or damage that is reminiscent to how many shots it holds, which by the way, could be even for damaging. How would you go about it?
Dead Boy wrote:All hail Jefffar... King of the Mods
Solothurn wrote:What about a Plasma weapon e-clip? The cartridge would have concentrated plasma fuel.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Last time I checked, there is no difference between an E-Clip and a 'plasma' E-Clip. It's just an E-Clip. It provides power to be utilized by whatever the gun is that you put it into, which then generates the shot.
It's just a big battery.
That's because it is a component to an energy based weapon and therefore is just call an energy clip. That doesn't mean that physics don't apply. That's where this misconception about it just being a big battery comes in. Besides a battery is for storing electrical energy only that doesn't go with the specific types of energy weapons. i.e. ion, plasma, laser(exception), particle, etc...
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Last time I checked, there is no difference between an E-Clip and a 'plasma' E-Clip. It's just an E-Clip. It provides power to be utilized by whatever the gun is that you put it into, which then generates the shot.
It's just a big battery.
That's because it is a component to an energy based weapon and therefore is just call an energy clip. That doesn't mean that physics don't apply. That's where this misconception about it just being a big battery comes in. Besides a battery is for storing electrical energy only that doesn't go with the specific types of energy weapons. i.e. ion, plasma, laser(exception), particle, etc...
Um...
Huh?
Battery = electricity
Tell me how an electricity cell(battery) is going to produce emissions of plasma, particles(particle accelerators), and ions.
E-clips have to be specific
Plasma Rifle = Plasma E-clip
Ion Rifle = Ionic E-clip
Laser Rifle(due to diodes, etc.)=Your 'just a car battery" (electricity)
The term E-clip is just a mixed metaphor.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Last time I checked, there is no difference between an E-Clip and a 'plasma' E-Clip. It's just an E-Clip. It provides power to be utilized by whatever the gun is that you put it into, which then generates the shot.
It's just a big battery.
That's because it is a component to an energy based weapon and therefore is just call an energy clip. That doesn't mean that physics don't apply. That's where this misconception about it just being a big battery comes in. Besides a battery is for storing electrical energy only that doesn't go with the specific types of energy weapons. i.e. ion, plasma, laser(exception), particle, etc...
Um...
Huh?
Battery = electricity
Tell me how an electricity cell(battery) is going to produce emissions of plasma, particles(particle accelerators), and ions.
E-clips have to be specific
Plasma Rifle = Plasma E-clip
Ion Rifle = Ionic E-clip
Laser Rifle(due to diodes, etc.)=Your 'just a car battery" (electricity)
The term E-clip is just a mixed metaphor.
LOL. You're actually trying to apply real world physics to Rifts?
Thats funny.
There has to be some RL physics involved. Other wise there wouldn't be a combat rule system then would there?
AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:I wish I had that info. Ofcourse new writers might not of realized that e-clip is a figure of speech and then acted on as if there is this "universal e-clip" with some special gumbo in it that can work in plasma, partical, and ionic weaponry.AdeptPaladin wrote:I'd figure that at most, the e-clip would function the same as the Naruni Plasma cartridge, as listed under trap construction.
Why couldn't they be? If an e-clip is little more than a battery (ie: it holds large amounts of potential energy), why wouldn't they be interchangeable. Between ion, particle, and laser weapons.. the difference isn't in the energy supplied but rather how it is applied to the emitter. For plasma weapons, you'd likely need a gas or other material to supply the actual plasma.. but there's no reason why an 'e-clip' couldn't supply the energy required to transform it into plasma and propel it.
it was an unintentional one.I should have said "are"Solothurn wrote:Joey Jo Jo Jr wrote:Dunno, I could be wrong, but I seem to remember that it says somewhere that eclips are like big batteries, I'll go look see if I can find it.
Perhaps. Perhaps it was a figure of speech as well. Notice your simile. "are like".
Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:I wish I had that info. Of course new writers might not of realized that e-clip is a figure of speech and then acted on as if there is this "universal e-clip" with some special gumbo in it that can work in plasma, particle, and ionic weaponry.AdeptPaladin wrote:I'd figure that at most, the e-clip would function the same as the Naruni Plasma cartridge, as listed under trap construction.
Why couldn't they be? If an e-clip is little more than a battery (ie: it holds large amounts of potential energy), why wouldn't they be interchangeable. Between ion, particle, and laser weapons.. the difference isn't in the energy supplied but rather how it is applied to the emitter. For plasma weapons, you'd likely need a gas or other material to supply the actual plasma.. but there's no reason why an 'e-clip' couldn't supply the energy required to transform it into plasma and propel it.
Hmm. Well. Ions are not the same as electrons(electricity). Particles in an particle accelerator weapon would be combination of everything and not just electrons. Plasma would need a canister in which would need fuel and since the pics show only a single clip, then one has to surmise that the clip has both in the single unit. See the complexity?
Ions are particles with too many electrons
Accelerated particles are are combinations of sub-particles including electrons.
Plasma would be like Hydrogen with ionization in it.
Those universal clips are pretty complex so I doubt very much that you can have just some universal e-clip that would work with everything. Remember Energy Clip just means energy, and since there are energy specific rifles, then the energy clips are automatically energy specific. Therefore there should be some level of increase of damage if grenades are taped to e-clips. There wouldn't just be a little fizzle.
AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:That is a somewhat a way to explain away the universal e-clip, but "e-clip" just means a clip that goes with the "e-rifle" as opposed to rail gun or other solid ammo weapons. The fact that e-clips being energy specific is a whole lot more realistic then saying that rifles can "magically"(not referring to TW) grasp everything else they need just from out of thin air to explain away this misconceived e-clip. Your thinking Im being over complicated? Such hubres. Why would there be nuclear powered robots if all they had to do is take from the air or water around them? If such tech was that widely available then nuclear power would be obselete, but it is not and is widely used. The only exception would be in space where there would be vacuums not to be taken advantaged enough to fuel the bot, so nuclear would be feasible, but not all robots are designed to do that, so that wouldn't be a valid counterpoint.
Seriously.. I think you're either confused, or I am.
Why would nuclear power be not used? The system I described has -nothing- to do with power generation, but everything to do with material collection. It would take power to collect, then process the materials used as well. Hence, the E-clip; a battery of energy designed to power the process and to cause the discharge.
So please, elaborate on your logic..
Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:That is a somewhat a way to explain away the universal e-clip, but "e-clip" just means a clip that goes with the "e-rifle" as opposed to rail gun or other solid ammo weapons. The fact that e-clips being energy specific is a whole lot more realistic then saying that rifles can "magically"(not referring to TW) grasp everything else they need just from out of thin air to explain away this misconceived e-clip. Your thinking I'm being over complicated? Such hubres. Why would there be nuclear powered robots if all they had to do is take from the air or water around them? If such tech was that widely available then nuclear power would be obsolete, but it is not and is widely used. The only exception would be in space where there would be vacuums not to be taken advantaged enough to fuel the bot, so nuclear would be feasible, but not all robots are designed to do that, so that wouldn't be a valid counterpoint.
Seriously.. I think you're either confused, or I am.
Why would nuclear power be not used? The system I described has -nothing- to do with power generation, but everything to do with material collection. It would take power to collect, then process the materials used as well. Hence, the E-clip; a battery of energy designed to power the process and to cause the discharge.
So please, elaborate on your logic..
Your assuming characteristics about weapons that are not in the books, in which, always implied the need for a clip. Your assumption about the type of tech you stated as the basis of your reasoning about e-clips, would, if in fact if it was official, would make the need for nuclear power, for vehicles lets say, obsolete. Meaning your rationalization isn't based on enough hard evidence to prove that your right when my explanation is clearly right because of the official pics and text in the book that only indicates the use of clips as the source of ammo the weapons use.
Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:That is a somewhat a way to explain away the universal e-clip, but "e-clip" just means a clip that goes with the "e-rifle" as opposed to rail gun or other solid ammo weapons. The fact that e-clips being energy specific is a whole lot more realistic then saying that rifles can "magically"(not referring to TW) grasp everything else they need just from out of thin air to explain away this misconceived e-clip. Your thinking I'm being over complicated? Such hubres. Why would there be nuclear powered robots if all they had to do is take from the air or water around them? If such tech was that widely available then nuclear power would be obsolete, but it is not and is widely used. The only exception would be in space where there would be vacuums not to be taken advantaged enough to fuel the bot, so nuclear would be feasible, but not all robots are designed to do that, so that wouldn't be a valid counterpoint.
Seriously.. I think you're either confused, or I am.
Why would nuclear power be not used? The system I described has -nothing- to do with power generation, but everything to do with material collection. It would take power to collect, then process the materials used as well. Hence, the E-clip; a battery of energy designed to power the process and to cause the discharge.
So please, elaborate on your logic..
Your assuming characteristics about weapons that are not in the books, in which, always implied the need for a clip. Your assumption about the type of tech you stated as the basis of your reasoning about e-clips, would, if in fact if it was official, would make the need for nuclear power, for vehicles lets say, obsolete. Meaning your rationalization isn't based on enough hard evidence to prove that your right when my explanation is clearly right because of the official pics and text in the book that only indicates the use of clips as the source of ammo the weapons use.
And my system -still- says there's a need for a clip: There's power needed to do what I described and the E-clip supplies it.
However, even IF e-clips are the only source of ammo used, you've ignored the fact that energy is mutable and can very easily change from one type to another. There's no need for weapon-specific e-clips.
Mutable yes. Easily mutable no. Besides, one can't take an e-clip from a CS rifle and use universly with NE rifles anyway. This also backs me up.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:That is a somewhat a way to explain away the universal e-clip, but "e-clip" just means a clip that goes with the "e-rifle" as opposed to rail gun or other solid ammo weapons. The fact that e-clips being energy specific is a whole lot more realistic then saying that rifles can "magically"(not referring to TW) grasp everything else they need just from out of thin air to explain away this misconceived e-clip. Your thinking I'm being over complicated? Such hubres. Why would there be nuclear powered robots if all they had to do is take from the air or water around them? If such tech was that widely available then nuclear power would be obsolete, but it is not and is widely used. The only exception would be in space where there would be vacuums not to be taken advantaged enough to fuel the bot, so nuclear would be feasible, but not all robots are designed to do that, so that wouldn't be a valid counterpoint.
Seriously.. I think you're either confused, or I am.
Why would nuclear power be not used? The system I described has -nothing- to do with power generation, but everything to do with material collection. It would take power to collect, then process the materials used as well. Hence, the E-clip; a battery of energy designed to power the process and to cause the discharge.
So please, elaborate on your logic..
Your assuming characteristics about weapons that are not in the books, in which, always implied the need for a clip. Your assumption about the type of tech you stated as the basis of your reasoning about e-clips, would, if in fact if it was official, would make the need for nuclear power, for vehicles lets say, obsolete. Meaning your rationalization isn't based on enough hard evidence to prove that your right when my explanation is clearly right because of the official pics and text in the book that only indicates the use of clips as the source of ammo the weapons use.
And my system -still- says there's a need for a clip: There's power needed to do what I described and the E-clip supplies it.
However, even IF e-clips are the only source of ammo used, you've ignored the fact that energy is mutable and can very easily change from one type to another. There's no need for weapon-specific e-clips.
Mutable yes. Easily mutable no. Besides, one can't take an e-clip from a CS rifle and use universly with NE rifles anyway. This also backs me up.
No it doesn't.
All it means is that Naruni weapons use PROPRIETY cartridges (to keep the customer coming back and digging deeper and deeper into debt).
In fact, throughout the books, E-Clips are just that, generic ammo (energy) carriers that can be used by just about ANY hand held weapons systems, which shoots your theory down. Time and again. In Russia, they use a different verson, the G-Clip, but can use the generic E-Clip by using an adapter.
Honestly, you've failed to YET provide any kind of real-world reason why your system is: a) better, b) more realistic, or c) right, either through application of real world science or through Rifts Canon.
If you run it the way you explained in your game, cool. Go for it.
But it's not canon by any stretch of the imagination.
Can you state the exact qoute that e-clips from one type of weapon can be used in another of different design. Book, page, etc....
E-Clip costs are pretty standard. Generally, a new, fully charged,
standard E-clip (short) will cost 5000 credits. Recharging an E-Clip
costs about 1500 credits. Some rifles can use what is called a "long"
E-clip which usually holds 30 shots. A Long E-Clip will cost 8000
credits new and 2000 to recharge. An energy clip can be recharged
hundreds of times before the storage cell burns out.
The Coalition has introduced a new type of weapon cell called a
canister E-Clip or "CE-Clip." The canister E-Clip can hold more
charges and can be used in conjunction with an E-Clip, providing a
weapon with a greater number of shots. At this time, only the Coalition
uses the canister clip and only a few weapons are designed to use the
new clip. Note: A canister clip will only be used on the two or three
CS weapons designed to use them. They can not be used on any other
energy weapons!
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:That is a somewhat a way to explain away the universal e-clip, but "e-clip" just means a clip that goes with the "e-rifle" as opposed to rail gun or other solid ammo weapons. The fact that e-clips being energy specific is a whole lot more realistic then saying that rifles can "magically"(not referring to TW) grasp everything else they need just from out of thin air to explain away this misconceived e-clip. Your thinking I'm being over complicated? Such hubres. Why would there be nuclear powered robots if all they had to do is take from the air or water around them? If such tech was that widely available then nuclear power would be obsolete, but it is not and is widely used. The only exception would be in space where there would be vacuums not to be taken advantaged enough to fuel the bot, so nuclear would be feasible, but not all robots are designed to do that, so that wouldn't be a valid counterpoint.
Seriously.. I think you're either confused, or I am.
Why would nuclear power be not used? The system I described has -nothing- to do with power generation, but everything to do with material collection. It would take power to collect, then process the materials used as well. Hence, the E-clip; a battery of energy designed to power the process and to cause the discharge.
So please, elaborate on your logic..
Your assuming characteristics about weapons that are not in the books, in which, always implied the need for a clip. Your assumption about the type of tech you stated as the basis of your reasoning about e-clips, would, if in fact if it was official, would make the need for nuclear power, for vehicles lets say, obsolete. Meaning your rationalization isn't based on enough hard evidence to prove that your right when my explanation is clearly right because of the official pics and text in the book that only indicates the use of clips as the source of ammo the weapons use.
And my system -still- says there's a need for a clip: There's power needed to do what I described and the E-clip supplies it.
However, even IF e-clips are the only source of ammo used, you've ignored the fact that energy is mutable and can very easily change from one type to another. There's no need for weapon-specific e-clips.
Mutable yes. Easily mutable no. Besides, one can't take an e-clip from a CS rifle and use universly with NE rifles anyway. This also backs me up.
No it doesn't.
All it means is that Naruni weapons use PROPRIETY cartridges (to keep the customer coming back and digging deeper and deeper into debt).
In fact, throughout the books, E-Clips are just that, generic ammo (energy) carriers that can be used by just about ANY hand held weapons systems, which shoots your theory down. Time and again. In Russia, they use a different verson, the G-Clip, but can use the generic E-Clip by using an adapter.
Honestly, you've failed to YET provide any kind of real-world reason why your system is: a) better, b) more realistic, or c) right, either through application of real world science or through Rifts Canon.
If you run it the way you explained in your game, cool. Go for it.
But it's not canon by any stretch of the imagination.
Can you state the exact qoute that e-clips from one type of weapon can be used in another of different design. Book, page, etc....
RMB, page 223:E-Clip costs are pretty standard. Generally, a new, fully charged,
standard E-clip (short) will cost 5000 credits. Recharging an E-Clip
costs about 1500 credits. Some rifles can use what is called a "long"
E-clip which usually holds 30 shots. A Long E-Clip will cost 8000
credits new and 2000 to recharge. An energy clip can be recharged
hundreds of times before the storage cell burns out.
It seems to me that E-Clips are pretty generic energy storage devices. Perhaps you could show me the quote (book, page, etc...) where it says that there are specific types? In fact, in the RMB, only the CE-Clip (Coalition Canister Clip) is the ONLY *-Clip that states it CANNOT be used on any other energy weapons, implying that E-Clips CAN be so used (ibid):The Coalition has introduced a new type of weapon cell called a
canister E-Clip or "CE-Clip." The canister E-Clip can hold more
charges and can be used in conjunction with an E-Clip, providing a
weapon with a greater number of shots. At this time, only the Coalition
uses the canister clip and only a few weapons are designed to use the
new clip. Note: A canister clip will only be used on the two or three
CS weapons designed to use them. They can not be used on any other
energy weapons!
That is a standard universally priced ranged rule not a standard universally designed e-clip rule. Also it uses the term e-clip as a generic term to mean it goes to energy weapons. The note for the canister is just to limit those particular canister to thier respective weapons which doesn't auotmatically implies the opposite for e-clips in general.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:AdeptPaladin wrote:.Solothurn wrote:.AdeptPaladin wrote:Solothurn wrote:.
..
..The Coalition has introduced a new type of weapon cell called a
canister E-Clip or "CE-Clip." The canister E-Clip can hold more
charges and can be used in conjunction with an E-Clip, providing a
weapon with a greater number of shots. At this time, only the Coalition
uses the canister clip and only a few weapons are designed to use the
new clip. Note: A canister clip will only be used on the two or three
CS weapons designed to use them. They can not be used on any other
energy weapons!
That is a standard universally priced ranged rule not a standard universally designed e-clip rule. Also it uses the term e-clip as a generic term to mean it goes to energy weapons. The note for the canister is just to limit those particular canister to thier respective weapons which doesn't auotmatically implies the opposite for e-clips in general.
Solothurn wrote:As for the CS vs NE. I was just pointing out a specific example to be general. Not specific to be specific to those particular examples.
Solothurn wrote:Also you just put your own foot in your mouth, because you failed to see the using an adapter doesn't necessarily mean that e-clips from an ion rifle can then be used on a laser rifle. It could just mean a e-clip from a plasma rifle to a plasma pistol. Both still being plasma but with different size clip housings.
Solothurn wrote:Esckey wrote:Then post the quote.
And in the end remember, most of us aren't going to be swayed by this, I'm sure all of us will still go by "an eclip is an eclip is an eclip" even if KS himself came down here and said "There are laser eclips, plasma eclips, ion eclips, particlebeam eclips, pistol eclips, rifle eclips.." and so on
Then why are you asking me to post a quote! [MODERATED] You guys think that just because the "E-Clip" being a general term, that it means it is universally compatible with any energy weapon. When what it really is saying is that the "E-Clip" is a general term that means it is just a clip that goes to an energy weapon. See the difference? The "E-Clip" just means a clip that goes to an Energy Weapon in general. That's it.
There doesn't have to be a quote saying the e-clips are energy specific because it is already implies that in the specific description of the energy weapon in what type it is. Ergo, Ion, Plasma, laser, etc...
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Last time I checked, there is no difference between an E-Clip and a 'plasma' E-Clip. It's just an E-Clip. It provides power to be utilized by whatever the gun is that you put it into, which then generates the shot.
It's just a big battery.
That's because it is a component to an energy based weapon and therefore is just call an energy clip. That doesn't mean that physics don't apply. That's where this misconception about it just being a big battery comes in. Besides a battery is for storing electrical energy only that doesn't go with the specific types of energy weapons. i.e. ion, plasma, laser(exception), particle, etc...
Dead Boy wrote:All hail Jefffar... King of the Mods
Solothurn wrote:What about a Plasma weapon e-clip? The cartridge would have concentrated plasma fuel.
Solothurn wrote:What about a Plasma weapon e-clip? The cartridge would have concentrated plasma fuel.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Last time I checked, there is no difference between an E-Clip and a 'plasma' E-Clip. It's just an E-Clip. It provides power to be utilized by whatever the gun is that you put it into, which then generates the shot.
It's just a big battery.
That's because it is a component to an energy based weapon and therefore is just call an energy clip. That doesn't mean that physics don't apply. That's where this misconception about it just being a big battery comes in. Besides a battery is for storing electrical energy only that doesn't go with the specific types of energy weapons. i.e. ion, plasma, laser(exception), particle, etc...
Um...
Huh?
Battery = electricity
Tell me how an electricity cell(battery) is going to produce emissions of plasma, particles(particle accelerators), and ions.E-clips have to be specific
Plasma Rifle = Plasma E-clip
Ion Rifle = Ionic E-clip
Laser Rifle(due to diodes, etc.)=Your 'just a car battery" (electricity)
The term E-clip is just a mixed metaphor.
E-Clip: Traditional automatic weapons have an ammo-clip. A cartridge
that holds bullets and is slapped into the weapon to supply its ammunition. An "E-Clip" is the equivalent for energy weapons like laser guns, ion blasters, particle beam rifles, and plasma ejectors, among others. (No differentiation, you shall note.) Instead of feeding the weapon bullets, an E-Clip is effectively a powerful battery that feeds the weapon energy to fire X number of energy blasts. (A Powerful Battery? Really? Isn't that what we said last night?) Typically, the more powerful the blast (i.e. the more damage it inflicts) the fewer shots are available from that weapon.
10. Northern Gun (NG) Self-Charging Power Packs. These items are relatively small battery packs that can be worn on the hip or back depending on the size. A cable runs from the pack to what looks like a standard E-Clip. (Standard? But Solothurn said they weren't 'standard') The E-Clip end snaps into the weapon like a normal clip, but provides additional power from the pack. Designed to power heavy ion, plasma and particle beam weapons that require a lot of energy.
Standard Japanese Pistol E-Clips. (But I though E-Clips weren't STANDARD?) All ArmaTech pistol weapons use the same standard hand-loaded energy magazine. H-Brand weapons use the same standard for their pistol clips which are cheap knock-offs of ArmaTech E-Clips. The magazines of both brands are interchangeable, although ArmaTech is of higher quality. They can also be used to power most bionic and cybernetic weapons. It is interesting to note that ArmaTech energy clips and basic weapon designs are fundamentally the same as those used by the Coalition States in distant North America; evidence that the Coalition's technology is based heavily on pre-Rifts technology unearthed from ancient ruins and held secret by the respective governments. Consequently, the weapons and E-Clips of both ArmaTech and H-Brand can be used in many of the weapons produced by the CS, Northern Gun, Bandito Arms and most North American manufacturers.), as well as the New Navy. (Standardized E-Clips? No, no. Couldn't be...)
Dead Boy wrote:All hail Jefffar... King of the Mods
vitae_drinker wrote:Some more quotes to show that Solothurn is indeed WRONG.
GMG, pg. 11:E-Clip: Traditional automatic weapons have an ammo-clip. A cartridge
that holds bullets and is slapped into the weapon to supply its ammunition. An "E-Clip" is the equivalent for energy weapons like laser guns, ion blasters, particle beam rifles, and plasma ejectors, among others. (No differentiation, you shall note.) Instead of feeding the weapon bullets, an E-Clip is effectively a powerful battery that feeds the weapon energy to fire X number of energy blasts. (A Powerful Battery? Really? Isn't that what we said last night?) Typically, the more powerful the blast (i.e. the more damage it inflicts) the fewer shots are available from that weapon.
Also, GMG, pg. 111:10. Northern Gun (NG) Self-Charging Power Packs. These items are relatively small battery packs that can be worn on the hip or back depending on the size. A cable runs from the pack to what looks like a standard E-Clip. (Standard? But Solothurn said they weren't 'standard') The E-Clip end snaps into the weapon like a normal clip, but provides additional power from the pack. Designed to power heavy ion, plasma and particle beam weapons that require a lot of energy.
And now, from GMG, pg. 137:Standard Japanese Pistol E-Clips. (But I though E-Clips weren't STANDARD?) All ArmaTech pistol weapons use the same standard hand-loaded energy magazine. H-Brand weapons use the same standard for their pistol clips which are cheap knock-offs of ArmaTech E-Clips. The magazines of both brands are interchangeable, although ArmaTech is of higher quality. They can also be used to power most bionic and cybernetic weapons. It is interesting to note that ArmaTech energy clips and basic weapon designs are fundamentally the same as those used by the Coalition States in distant North America; evidence that the Coalition's technology is based heavily on pre-Rifts technology unearthed from ancient ruins and held secret by the respective governments. Consequently, the weapons and E-Clips of both ArmaTech and H-Brand can be used in many of the weapons produced by the CS, Northern Gun, Bandito Arms and most North American manufacturers.), as well as the New Navy. (Standardized E-Clips? No, no. Couldn't be...)
So, Solothurn is WRONG.
Thank you.
Edit: Bold is added, and italics are my comments.
Jefffar wrote:Check out the Northern Gun Power Pack in Rifts Mercenaries.
The same power pack can be used to power a laser rifle, an ion pistol and a plasma ejector.
Thinyser wrote:Jefffar wrote:Check out the Northern Gun Power Pack in Rifts Mercenaries.
The same power pack can be used to power a laser rifle, an ion pistol and a plasma ejector.
Ding ding ding! we have a winner here folks!
Hmmm maybe thats because they all use electricity to power the electronics of the weapons, and the electronics then convert the raw electrical energy (and possibly a bit of matter from the surroundings) into the other specific type (ion, light, plasma, partcle) and emit this from the barrel.
Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Thinyser wrote:Jefffar wrote:Check out the Northern Gun Power Pack in Rifts Mercenaries.
The same power pack can be used to power a laser rifle, an ion pistol and a plasma ejector.
Ding ding ding! we have a winner here folks!
Hmmm maybe thats because they all use electricity to power the electronics of the weapons, and the electronics then convert the raw electrical energy (and possibly a bit of matter from the surroundings) into the other specific type (ion, light, plasma, partcle) and emit this from the barrel.
Yep.
That's in the middle quote of my previous post.
<Mr. Rogers Voice>So, children, can we all say Solothurn is WRONG?
I know you can.</Mr. Rogers Voice>
Show me where it says that energy rifles do that. Then you can have a real Mr. Rogers fantasy.
Solothurn wrote:Maybe thats because the pack can hold different types of energy ammo. That still doesn't prove me wrong.
Solothurn wrote:Also a standard energy clip in the quotes don't explain what the specific energy is. Therefore they could just be saying a standard e-clip of a laser rifle can be used in a laser pistol or other laser rifle, and they where just going by the terms standard e-clip for short as a mixed metaphor. That still doesn't dissprove the they can't be used in plasma weapons.
Not in the books that i can find, that is only one posters supposition, not canon.Solothurn wrote:Thinyser wrote:Solothurn wrote:vitae_drinker wrote:Thinyser wrote:Jefffar wrote:Check out the Northern Gun Power Pack in Rifts Mercenaries.
The same power pack can be used to power a laser rifle, an ion pistol and a plasma ejector.
Ding ding ding! we have a winner here folks!
Hmmm maybe thats because they all use electricity to power the electronics of the weapons, and the electronics then convert the raw electrical energy (and possibly a bit of matter from the surroundings) into the other specific type (ion, light, plasma, partcle) and emit this from the barrel.
Yep.
That's in the middle quote of my previous post.
<Mr. Rogers Voice>So, children, can we all say Solothurn is WRONG?
I know you can.</Mr. Rogers Voice>
Show me where it says that energy rifles do that. Then you can have a real Mr. Rogers fantasy.
Um....see the blue part... DUH!
YOU are the only person that seems to not understand how e-clips work. The term e-clip is not a "mixed metaphor" describing a tank of plasma or a ion battery or any of the other things you suggest. It is an electrical (hence the E) storage device that "is effectively a powerful battery".
Now I would contest that it is not really a "battery" but rather a capicitor as the discharge rate is much too high for a battery.
Now naruni plasma cartridge weapons use their propritory ammo (specifically designed plasma cartidges) and these I believe would work for your grenade enhancement but e-clips are "effectively powerful batteries" according to canon, and as such, would have no effect on the size of an explosion.
By continuing this debate you only show that you are too stuborn to admit that you are, in fact, wrong according to canon.
Aren't plasma cartridges also explained away as e-clips?
Solothurn wrote:Aren't plasma cartridges also explained away as e-clips?
Solothurn wrote:To me: Standard E-clip = mixed metaphor
To you: Standard E-clip = an official type of universal design
When they say the energy rifle take standard e-clips, Im thinking standard e-clips that go to the rifle. You are going by a universal standard e-clip that not only goes to that rifle, but of a eclip that happens to go with all other e rifles in general as well.
My intreptretation is correct and realistic based on the type of weapons that come with thier own type of standard e-clip due to the differences of the type of weapon.
You are intrepretating it non-realistically and with too many assumptions in the form of invisible rules of how the tech works, and for the convienence of scavaging.
The wording goes both ways. Its just semantics. BUT my intrepretation is more realistic and is better for more of a gritty way of playing. Not some kiddy version that isn't realistic enough.
Dead Boy wrote:All hail Jefffar... King of the Mods