Blue_Lion wrote:eliakon wrote:Blue_Lion wrote:ShadowLogan wrote:If they describe CFT clearly as lasers, and those lasers aren't susceptible to laser resistance factors they would have to offer up some reason why the CFT laser is special (not that hard). By omitting a laser reference they get around the entire issue and even save space or make space available for other more relevant bits here (or elsewhere in the book).
And we are at at impasse. Palladium hasn't revisited CFT to offer up more information that could settle the two most common issues with the tech in the book (ie "what it actually fires" and "can it fire a conventional round").
The fact they have not stated what it actually fires is why I say is undefined type of energy and not lasers.
Which makes as much sense as saying they fire work...
Energy weapons shoot something and not just 'generic energy' since energy can not be conveyed with out being in a form to BE conveyed in.
Now the question of what they ARE is canonically unstated I agree.Blue_Lion wrote:I am sorry I just can not buy the logic in the first one. If the where intended to be lasers they would need to tell us that clearly so we would know. If they where immune to something that should affect them if they where intended to be lasers we would need to know. the fact they do not tell us something note worthy about them makes them unlikely to be what is note worthy.(lasers)Omitting a laser reerence if they are lasers to avoid a issue they should address to save space but expect people to know they are lasers makes no sense.
This argument though doesnt hold up well since there are resistances and defenses to every possible form of energy beam/blast that the weapon fires. Thus the lack of a specific form of resistance not being mentioned does not prove that it can not be that kind of energy beam/blast or we would be left with it not actually firing anything at all...
since we can manifestly prove that it DOES shot something then we can also prove that what ever it shoots is protected against by some defense normally and that, in typical palladium fasion, it just was not specified what.
So your opinion is that weapons can not be unstated generic. That is untrue remember this is a game not realty. Things only have a type when stated to have a type.
To me the idea that it has to be something because it can not be generic does not hold up. In real life there may be no undefined/generic energy but this is a game not reality and the game can and does have such things.
And the argument does hold up as if it was intended to be any type of energy that has type specific defenses they would need to tell us that. If it is intended to be a type of energy and immune to normal defenses for it, is something they would need to tell us.
To me your counter seams to amount to I do not want it to be generic and they do not need to tell us when something is something specific and if it has some special characteristics for the type of energy it is.(And i find that fundamentally flawed logic when it comes to what is what in game world where things are what we are told they are.)
***By canon, RAW and what we can tell of intent it a undefined type of energy. So while treated as energy it is not any form of known energy.***
Actually your stance that generic energy is a game thing is not supported by canon as far as I can tell.
Simply because we are not told what it is, does not mean it does not have a kind.
Now if you have an example of Canon Rifts material with generic "non-specific energy" below the Elder Race level of technology I would be interested (and be willing to entertain changing my opinion on this)
But as it is, the lack of us being told the kind of something does not mean that it doesn't have a kind.
After all, we are not told what railgun rounds are made out of, so I guess we must assume that they are made out of undifferentiated matter. In fact by this logic I guess we must presume that almost everything in the game is made out of some generic undifferentiated matter as they very rarely tell us what it IS made out of...
Almost as if not telling us the details does not mean that those details do not exist.
(or I guess you could argue that there are only around 20-30 elements in total in the Palladium Universe )