Shark_Force wrote:the references to victim blaming come from the idiotic statement that tolkeen should have just left and it's their own fault for not leaving that they got killed
If you opt to stay within area claimed by a mad king who is amassing a demon army, and know he is being attacked by humans with a ruthless history regarding shapeshifters, it's your risk to take, and not their fault.
Shark_Force wrote:which is like saying that if a criminal with a gun decides to rob your house, you should just abandon your house and let the criminal steal whatever he wants, otherwise you're to blame for anything the criminal does.
Except it's not actually your house. A closer analogy would be a gun-wielding criminal breaks into a house and kills the owner, and you follow him and live in the house with him, and decide to stay in the house when the owner's gun-wielding kid gets home to claim his inheritance.
Shark_Force wrote:there's a fairly significant difference between
"building up for a fight to protect your home while also trying to prevent the fight from ever happening and not starting the fight so that you have the advantage of surprise and being able to pick a moment of relative strength for yourself"
and
"building up for a fight that you are threatening to bring to someone else, so that you can take their stuff and kill everyone there, then starting that fight the moment you're ready"
With the first part in which I figure you mean this is Tolkeen, it is possible to build up defenses without building up things which can be used offensively. Summoning demons, for example, who could be sent to attack innocent human towns in Minnesota (or the Chi-Town burbs) is much more alarming to the CS than simply building a series of walls and towers with mini-missiles on them to shoot down LRMs.
As for the second part, I don't recall anything about the CS taking their stuff. The land which the CS needs to occupy is traditionally humanity's, not dragons and those who sell out the common human interest so they can be co-lords with dragons.
Shark_Force wrote:tolkeen pretty clearly didn't want the fight, but were ready to fight if it became necessary to protect themselves.
It wasn't necessary, because leaving would have removed the necessity. Creed was clearly spoiling for a fight.
Shark_Force wrote:the CS wanted the fight from the very beginning and refused to even consider any options other than starting that fight once they were ready.
Incorrect, the CS wanted the land and to neutralize a growing nearby threat. Fleeing would have removed the reasons.
It is Tolkeen who refused to consider other options, since they abandoned negotiations. It is also Tolkeen who started the fighting, by confronting CS forces and preventing their maneuvering in Minnesota on multiple occasions, despite having no rightful claim to that land and not curbing the Xiticix threat as the CS would have done.
Freemage wrote:I was asked for book-and-page references for the notion that the CS had a formal policy of genocide. I direct the curious to page 13 of Coalition Overkill
Their opponents? A disease — no, a plague. A plague that needs to be wiped off the face of the Earth. The fact that this "plague" happens to be sentient beings is said only to make the war all the more tragic. However, that last sentiment is part of the "official" position to justify CS aggression and soften the Coalition's open campaign of genocide.
So there you have it in black-and-white--the High Command absolutely DOES seek to commit genocide against any non-humans on Earth,
I would like if you or someone could link to the post where you were asked this so we can clarify who asked you, and what you had originally said.
It is well known that the CS has a policy of genocide against CERTAIN species. The most notable being the Xiticix, who Lazlo also has a policy of genocide against.
You are making the claim here that they are genocidal against ANY non-humans.
I do not believe Overkill13 supports that.
The Coalition does have an open campaign of genocide, but I don't see anything here specifying that it is against any non-humans.
Dog Boys are non-humans, for example. So even if it said "the CS has an open policy against non-humans" it would clearly have to mean SOME non-humans, as they are not genocidal against Dog Boys.
You must find a quote saying against ALL non-humans.
Freemage wrote:Edit to add another quote, from page 14:
At the Tolkeen front, nothing short of complete genocide is acceptable to the invading Coalition Army. This has led to extreme overkill, where CS troops fight like men possessed, towns and cities are turned into rubble, farms torched and the enemy slaughtered — even when they try to surrender or flee. Retreating enemy forces are hunted and put down like mad dogs. Worse, there is no distinction made between warrior and innocent, all nonhumans and practitioners of magic are gunned down, including women and children. Few prisoners are taken unless they are needed for interrogation, extortion, a trap, or other sinister purpose. However torture is frowned upon. Not for any humanitarian reason, but because it keeps a deadly and potentially dangerous individual alive longer than necessary.
Folks who want to deny the genocidal aspect are basically ignoring the entire book.
Nope, just reading the details. Your first sentence here from Overkill14 doesn't actually specify the complete genocide of WHOM. It can't apply to EVERYONE because that would include genocide of themselves. This could simply mean complete genocide of supernatural beings like the Daemonix or Dragons, which is a perfectly reasonable precaution, as both are perfectly capable of fleeing if they don't want to fight.
Yes the ENEMY is slaughtered, even if they run (because fleeing enemies can regroup and attack you again).
The distinction between warrior and innocent is that a warrior is someone who is presently fighting, and an innocent is someone they haven't witnessed fighting.
Just because someone is subjectively innocent of any presently witnessed crime doesn't mean they are actually innocent or not a threat to you. A fleeing "innocent" dragon is still perfectly capable of morphing into a bunny and coming back later and eating you.
"Few prisoners are taken" proves that not everyone is being killed. They "gun down" nonhumans and practitioners of magic, sure, but that doesn't mean they kill them. STUNGUNS.
Freemage wrote:Edit again: And More, page 15:
Not all Coalition soldiers are combat-numbed zombies or mad dog-killers bent on genocide. Some (at least 25-30%) will show mercy and compassion to the enemy whenever it is reasonable, and they think they can get away with it. This may be something as little as giving a D-Bee prisoner (or sorcerer) a blanket, cup of water, food or medical treatment, to showing a captive some measure of respect and/or kindness, refraining from torture and even letting obviously innocent people go (particularly women and children). Such kindness is often done in secret, when the majority who have (at least temporarily) lost their humanity are not looking.
So 70-75% of the army IS bent on genocide and annihilation.
Yes, genocide and annihilation of the Daemonix. It doesn't say they're bent on genocide against ALL NON-HUMANS. That's the rub here.
I'm sure a significant portion of Lazlo soldiers are bent on genocide and annihilation of the Xiticix. There's nothing wrong with being bent on genocide against a threatening species.
Freemage wrote:Same page goes on to state that those 'good guy' CS troops can face anything from official reprimands and unofficial beatings all the way up to state-sanctioned execution after a trial (or summary execution in the field, possibly with the option of doing it themselves if they want their 'crime' [letting an innocent D-bee child or other non-combatant escape] to be covered up).
So? It's a false dichotomy to suggest there are only 2 options: kill them or let them escape. You can prevent a D-Bee's escape and gun them down with a stun gun for questioning without killing them. I think Lone Star also had some nice net guns.
Escape can also be prevented if the D-Bees surrender to CS authorities.
What should the CS do, let them run off and warn nearby guerrillas to ambush the platoon?
SycophantNagaraja wrote:I have always felt that the CS was genocidal (and basically Rifts version of Nazis) and your fact checking confirmed that for me
The CS and Lazlo are both genocidal groups. That has never been disputed.
The question here is who they are genocidal toward.
Both are explicitly genocidal towards Xiticix. The CS are also genocidal towards 2 known species in WB30, one eats everything in site and another likes to pull pins off grenades for fun, both are clearly dangerous to human survival. That WB30 goes out of its way to discuss CS genocide towards only 2 species while not mentioning it for all the others is HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS, no? Almost as if the CS isn't genocidal towards those other species.
dreicunan wrote:RE: Genocide - It is also directly stated that the Coalition has made clear in word and deed that it will be a war of genocide on page 7 of Sedition (KS's intro to the book).
Clearly there has to be some genocide, the CS can't really afford to take the demons Tolkeen summons alive. Dragons are pretty much too dangerous to capture too.
The CS having a policy of genocide still doesn't clarify which species the genocide is for.
As dreicunan has pointed out, these policies of genocide are also localized to a specific campaign and do not reflect the country's overall policies outside of wartime situations.
For example: I am genocidal to mice in my garage and lay traps to kill them, but I am not genocidal to mice in my backyard and do not lay traps there, I even chase them off so my dogs don't eat them.
Nightmask wrote:the CS is clearly listed as being genocidal against all those target groups without any kind of 'but only the D-bees and mages of Tolkeen' qualifier.
..
the metaplot is quite clear that the CS's policy of genocide is against all non-humans and mages
..
it's written in the books that they're out to exterminate all non-humans and mages
WHERE?
Shark_Force wrote:nothing about phrases like "combat-numbed zombies" or "mad dog killers" would suggest that they are in any way likely to carry this attitude towards other d-bees, mages, psychics, etc. nope.
You seem to rely on the false dichotomy that anyone who is not B must be A
A) combat-numbed zombies or mad dog-killers bent on genocide
B) will show mercy and compassion to the enemy whenever it is reasonable
Does not showing compassion/mercy during "reasonable" situations necessarily mean someone is bent on genocide or combat-numbed?
I'll use myself as an example: even though I could reasonably smile at a homeless person, I do NOT show that compassion. I do my best to ignore them. I view showing compassion as being a weakness. and do not want to do that on the streets where it might invite someone to approach me.
This might make me all kinds of bad things, but it is not because I am combat-numbed or because I am bent on genocide.
So based on this, I reject Freemage's "70-75% of the army IS bent on genocide and annihilation" proposal, and your support of it.
Also worth noting that this can also be read "mad dog killers bent on genocide" or "combat-numbed zombies".
It doesn't necessarily mean that if they are not mad-dog killers that they must be "combat-numbed zombies bent on genocide".
Being a combat-numbed zombie is an entirely different thing than being genocidal.
Freemage wrote:I agree with those who say they crossed the Moral Event Horizon by summoning demons (and not even in a manner that controlled them, meaning that the demons were--and continue to be--free to run amok doing exactly what you would expect demons to do).
Even the means of controlling demons lack reliability. If a mage is killed they are free to stay wreaking havok uninhibited. Or even if the mage falls asleep and forgets to send them back in time (summon lesser beings) or if they win a contest of wills (Summoners and RUE Shifters' new similar ability)
Killer Cyborg wrote:I'd say that the CS currently isn't being actively genocidal (though I'm a book or three behind current events), but they were actively genocidal with Tolkeen, and they will most likely be actively genocidal against the next magic place that they invade/attack.
Actively genocidal against what element though? Are we sure it was the entire thing or just the demon/dragon elements?
I can, for example, be genocidal during a war against Nxla by killing EVERY single Xombie I come across, but not be genocidal towards Harvesters.
Killer Cyborg wrote:Here is perhaps the single most important part of this section:
by creating false homes.
I bet Tolkeen did a lot of that, sold you land but the house was just an illusion, as you soon discovered on the first rainfall.
Killer Cyborg wrote:I've never really considered before if there was a "main character" in the Coalition Wars series, but if there is, I'm not sure that it's Tolkeen. It might well be the Coalition.
I'm going to hedge my bets on the Cyber-Knights. They were probably more affected by this than the CS was.
HWalsh wrote:In HOH it says that they still totally intend on genocide.
Page/quote? To whom?
Pg 20 mentions "If the only options are peace and genocide, the Coalition has chosen genocide." but that's only conditional genocide when peace is the only other option, and isn't explicitly against all D-Bees, we just know it's directed to at least some of them.
HWalsh wrote:As SoT said - 30% were good at the time SoT started. Those good ones didn't survive. They changed, were executed, or were thrown in prison.
Now 5% are good, 30% are selfish, 65% are evil.
This sounds interesting, I would like to read where it talks about this. Where?
HWalsh wrote:The "Night of Forgiveness" purged the mages and dbees from the Chi-Town 'Burbs as well.
There are no longer dbees in the burbs.
I'm checking out page 11-12 of HOH right now, where does it say there are no longer ANY there?
11 says overnight it became a very dangerous place for d-bees, mages and freethinkers (I guess previously it was just dangerous, but not VERY) and that "D-Bees and practitioners of magic fall under brutal attack" and "all things nonhuman and magical seem tainted, dirty, ugly, and need to be purged".
Sure they all NEED to be purged, but are all of them actually purged?
12 says "Countless innocent D-Bees are strung up and hanged until dead. Others are murdered in their own beds." then "D-Bees who would have fought alongside their human neighbors against the demon hordes are slaughtered by the thousands".
So we know at least 2000 D-Bees were killed, but do we know how many there were to begin with?
Are we sure none managed to hide and avoid some of this?
I could see Auto-Gs and maybe the odd Pleasurer or Changeling managing to avoid this. Or maybe human D-Bees from other realities who can't be discerned from non-human D-Bees.