Pepsi Jedi wrote:flatline wrote:Pepsi Jedi wrote:"Your" power (where ever it's from or made of) doesn't fry your hand when you produce it, so it doesn't fry you if you are hit with it.
Premise: "your power doesn't fry your hand when you produce it"
Conclusion: "your power doesn't fry you if you are hit with it"
The conclusion doesn't follow from the premise.
--flatline
Sure it does. "This fire I produce doesn't burn me when I make it. Why would it suddenly burn me seconds later. Is it some how more 'firy'? No. It's the same fire I just made that didn't burn me a bit.
You're projecting some sort of change in the energy expulsion, during it's 'life time.'. I.E. when I make it I'm fine and not burned but suddenly the fire that didn't burn me changes and now can burn me?
Where are you seeing the change? Is it a micron from the hand? seems too close, You'd still get burned. An inch? Still pretty close. A foot out, does the fire suddenly acquire the ability to burn you after a foot of distance? Why A foot? Why not 9 inches? Or 24? Or 10 feet? Where's the cut off point for "Doesn't burn me" that turns into "OH CRAP THAT BURNS!"
If the conclusion followed from the premise, then I could add other premises without changing the conclusion as long as my new premises don't contradict the existing premises.
Let's try that, shall we?
Original Premise: "your power doesn't fry your hand when you produce it"
New Premise: "the energy doesn't manifest until it's a safe distance away from you"
Conclusion: "your power doesn't fry you if you are hit with it"
But wait! If you're hit by the energy, then you're no longer a safe distance from it!
If you feel that the new premise contradicts the original premise, then you are probably mentally inserting other premises (aka "hidden premises") that
do contradict the new premise. However, if the original argument requires additional hidden premises for the conclusion to follow, then that means that the conclusion
does not follow from the given premise in the absence of the hidden premises.
--flatline
I don't care about canon answers. I'm interested in good, well-reasoned answers and, perhaps, a short discussion of how that answer is supported or contradicted by canon.
If I don't provide a book and page number, then don't assume that I'm describing canon. I'll tell you if I'm describing canon.